
Accounting, Organizations and Society, 26, 565–596.Ĭarroll, J. Institutional theory and accounting rule choice: An analysis of four US state governments’ decisions to adopt GAAP. ‘Sampling and the abstraction of knowledge in the auditing profession: an extended institutional theory perspective’, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 18, pp. International Journal of Auditing, 9, 117–127.Ĭarpenter, B. Changes in internal auditing during the time of the major US accounting scandals. Enterprise Resource Planning Systems and accountants: towards hybridization? European Accounting Review, 13(1), 123–153.Ĭarcello, J., Hermanson, D., & Raghunandan, K. A summary of the global common body of knowledge 2006 (CBOK) study in internal auditing. Internal auditors and a value-added approach: The new business regime. The modern corporation and private property. New York: Anchor Books.īerle, A., & Means, G. N., Madsen, R., Sullivan, W., Swidler, A., & Tipton, S. Institutionalization and structuration: Studying the links between action and institution. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31, 61–103.īarley, S. The alignment of technology and structure through roles and networks. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31, 78–108.īarley, S. Technology as an occasion for structuring: Evidence from observations of CT scanners and the Social order of radiology departments.

Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(3), 477–506.īarley, S. The organizational transformation process: The micropolitics of dissonance reduction and the alignment of logics of action. International Journal of Enterprise Information Systems, 3(4), 1–21.īacharach, S. The Impact of enterprise Systems on business and audit practice and the implications for University accounting education. International Journal of Auditing, 14, 111–129.Īrnold, V., & Sutton, S. The jurisdiction of internal auditing and the quest for professionalization: The Danish case. International Journal of Auditing, 13, 43–60.Īrena, M., & Jeppeson, K.
GENERALLY ACCEPTED AUDITING STANDARDS 3.2 DRIVERS
Identifying organizational drivers of internal audit effectiveness. Strategic response to institutional influences on information systems outsourcing. An examination of the relationship between internal and external audit in the Saudi Arabian corporate sector. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 14, 507–531.Īl-Twaijry, A., Brierley, J., & Gwilliam, D. The development of internal audit in Saudi Arabia: An institutional theory perspective. Journal of Information Systems, 22(2), 195–214.Īl-Twaijry, A., Brierley, J., & Gwilliam, D. Putting continuous auditing theory into practice: Lessons from two pilot implementations. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems (June), 137–161.Īlles, M., Kogan, A., & Vasarhelyi, M. Continuous monitoring of business process controls: A pilot implementation of a continuous auditing system at Siemens. Internal Auditor (Feb.), 25–27.Īlles, M., Brennan, G., Kogan, A., & Vasarhelyi, M. The European literature review on internal auditing. Managerial Auditing Journal, 9(8), 8–12.Īllegrini, M., D’Onza, G., Melville, R., Paape, L., & Sarens, G.

International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 11(3), 140–151.Īdams, M. Factors associated with IT audits by the internal audit function.

Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Ībdolmohammadi, M., & Boss, S. The system of professions: An essay of the division of expert labor.

Therefore, a comprehensive model of the relation between IT and organisations would address micro- and macro-forces at the same time.Ībbott, A. Moreover, human actions are constrained by forces beyond the control of actors and often outside their awareness. ERP technologies exert pressures on the social organisation of work. While the majority of researchers work from a macro- or a micro-social perspective, the two may be best understood as complementary processes. Between these two main aspects is the process of resolution of institutional misalignments through the strategic response to institutional pressures. The internal audit change process is viewed as a response to the new ERP system which constrains activities and shapes the cognitive processes of internal auditors, and corporate governance’s forces that influence specific configuration of the IAF. It is used to interpret results as it examines how institutions influence organisational actors and provides a mean of analysis. This book draws on institutional theory to interpret IAF changes.
